|
Thursday February 9, 2012
Main MenuIn The NewsFeature ArticlesGov Reports |
Home :: Comment :: Reply :: 6813 :: 8910 ::
Reply |
Home | Sitemap | Answer Board | Ask a Question | Contact | About | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
DISCLAIMER: STATEMENTS MADE ON THE SEXLAWS.ORG WEBSITE ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE LEGAL ADVICE! Statements made here are intended to give a general description of laws and crimes in your jurisdiction. While we make every effort to ensure the information presented is accurate and timely, laws change and mistakes can happen. For absolute accuracy regarding any laws, contact your state legislature. This site provides information about laws. For legal advice, please consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. Copyright © Sexlaws.org 2003-2009 All Rights Reserved


I love how neither the body who posted this article, nor those speaking for or against it cannot spell. It's amusing. I believe that age of consent is very restrictive. It should be charged based on the maturity of each participant. I believe the same for "sexting". If either party is deemed too immature to handle sexual scenarios, and the other is aware of this and engages in the activity anyway, it is wrong. If a 10 year old can watch an R rated movie with parental consent, then it is unreasonable to charge for "sexting" if parents consent. Hit me with all your religious bullshit, young and old backwoods psycho conservatives. Religion has nothing to do with the legal system. If your children aren't firm enough in their beliefs not to participate in activities violating your religious doctrine, the beliefs weren't there to begin with. I'm a thirteen year old girl from Ohio.