|
Thursday May 17, 2012
Main MenuIn The NewsFeature ArticlesGov Reports |
Home :: Comment :: Reply :: 1716 :: 10391 ::
Reply |
Home | Sitemap | Answer Board | Ask a Question | Contact | About | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
DISCLAIMER: STATEMENTS MADE ON THE SEXLAWS.ORG WEBSITE ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE LEGAL ADVICE! Statements made here are intended to give a general description of laws and crimes in your jurisdiction. While we make every effort to ensure the information presented is accurate and timely, laws change and mistakes can happen. For absolute accuracy regarding any laws, contact your state legislature. This site provides information about laws. For legal advice, please consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. Copyright © Sexlaws.org 2003-2012 All Rights Reserved


I read your post and must agree that everyone should not be labeled. There needs to be a distinction. My 20 year old son was approached by a female with a fake id saying she was 18. Took him to her hotel room had sex with him. Because of Delaware's and the law of the world "Ignorance of one's age does not constitute a defense" he is now a registered sex offender because she was 15 not 16. He has loss jobs, he can not go back to college we have been ostracized from communities and forced to move because of the 1000 feet rule. This is not fair. Especially when his home of record, which is NC, states that this would not have been a registrably offense. Because there was not 6 or more years between the ages. Something must be done.